Baltimore's Considers Building Canal
Maryland Considered Extending C&O to Baltimore
© Jim Rada
Jul 12, 2008
Though the City Fathers of Baltimore, Maryland, were counting on the Baltimore and Ohio Railroad to keep them a viable port city, railroads were still a relatively untested technology in 1838. Not only that but it seemed that the rival Chesapeake and Ohio Canal would capture the land needed to build the railroad.
A C&O Canal Extension
In early 1838, Maryland Governor T. W. Veazey directed Col. J. J. Abert, chief of the U.S. Corps of Topographical Engineers to survey a route for C&O Canal to connect to the City of Baltimore. Because of all the public backing the city had given the railroad effort, the document was not made public until 1874 long after the railroad had proven its worth to the city and country (J. J. Abert, Report in Reference to the Canal to Connect the Chesapeake and Ohio Canal with the City of Baltimore, Washington: Government Printing Office, 1874).
The Baltimore and Ohio Railroad
The B&O Railroad had broken ground on July 4, 1828, with much hoopla and an hours-long parade. Charles Carroll, the last living signer of the Declaration of Independence, helped lay the cornerstone.
However, the railroad was not without competition. The C&O Canal had broken ground on the same day and had the backing of the federal government. To make matters worse, both projects sought to reach Cumberland, Maryland, and capture the lucrative coal trade.
Alternate Canal Routes
Abert was told to look for “the most northern practicable route of the routes by the valleys of the Monocacy and the Patapsco, or by a route diverging from said Chesapeake and Ohio Canal at the mouth of the Seneca River.” The chosen route needed to be entirely in Maryland and have an ample supply of water.
Some earlier surveying had been done and Abert was able to narrow the possible routes down to three:
- The Westminster Route
- The Linganore Route
- The Seneca Route
Choosing the Best Route
Abert submitted his report in April 1838. He found that the Westminister Route was so poor a choice that it didn’t merit further consideration. The Linganore Route lacked water, but it had some possibilities. The Seneca Route was a stronger possibility, though.
In surveying the route, a better choice presented itself and was called the Brookeville Route. It had adequate water and could be built.
Canal Becomes a Moot Point
Whether the governor gave the canal serious consideration is unknown. Four years later, the B&O reached Cumberland and proved itself all that the city had hoped four in making Baltimore a viable port city. The C&O Canal did not reach Cumberland until 1850, eight years later.
