American History

» _Boanerges_ - Corruption

In response to Corruption posted by pink101:
..you will see that the U.S. government including at least two administrations knew that the Twin Towers were the target.

The Twin Towers and bldg #7 were not targets, Phil.. they were INTENTIONALLY blown up.... intentionally! They were not brought down by Arab terrorist that hijacked planes... As long as that story is being stated, then the truth is not being publicized and the "war on terror" is the excuse to continue the fear mongering.

The towers were purposely planned to be exploded, not from airplanes, but by explosives deliberately set inside those buildings over a period of time!...

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» pink101 - Delusional

In response to Corruption posted by _Boanerges_:
.
So, when I saw that airplane crashing into the side of the building, I must have been delusional, huh?
.
And, later, the replays on the tube? They must have been staged?
.
Did the astronauts land on the moon or were those videos made on a Hollywood set? That's what one of my shirt tail relatives says.
.

-- posted by pink101

» _Boanerges_ - Delusional

In response to Delusional posted by pink101:
when I saw that airplane crashing into the side of the building, I must have been delusional, huh?
The planes did not cause the buildings to collapse....
The planes were not flown by suicide terrorists... There is no such thing as the "war on terror".. Its the 21st century "wag the dog" - given to scare the masses into totalitarianism....

but.. weve been here before.. my dog aint in this fight any longer.... Good luck in your efforts!

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» Brian Tubbs - Planes were drones, right?

In response to Delusional posted by _Boanerges_:

I've read several conspiracy articles and listened to a number of conspiracy videos. Most of the ones I've listened to either ignored the planes or posited that they were drones.

My question is...what happened to all the passengers on the planes that didn't strike the Pentagon and World Trade Center - or the plane that crashed in PA? Where's Todd Beamer?

» Brian Tubbs - Brainwashed idiot?

I guess, Wendell, I'm a brainwashed idiot for not agreeing with you.

» _Boanerges_ - Planes were drones, right?

In response to Planes were drones, right? posted by BrianTubbs:
My question is...what happened to all the passengers on the planes that didn't strike the Pentagon and World Trade Center - or the plane that crashed in PA? Where's Todd Beamer?

First, the focus should be on the buildings. Second, it has been shown that the original planes were diverted before take-off... meaning the planes that hit the buildings were drones....

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» _Boanerges_ - Brainwashed idiot?

In response to Brainwashed idiot? posted by BrianTubbs:
I guess, Wendell, I'm a brainwashed idiot for not agreeing with you.
Its not a matter of agreeing with me, Brian. Its a plain fact the buildings collapsed.
As far as calling you an idiot, Brian, I suggest you reread my comments. This type of division and side tracking is useless....
What strikes me as curious is how you ignore my statement in the Ecclesiastes discussion, but.. in this dicussion, feel I have labeled YOU an idiot.... and feel compelled to make such a claim, yet ignore the other altogether...
sigh.... this conversation like the Ecclesiastes conversation, for me, has ended.... Good luck and best wishes with these discussions..

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» pink101 - Grasping At Straws

In response to Brainwashed idiot? posted by _Boanerges_:
.
"sigh.... this conversation like the Ecclesiastes conversation, for me, has ended.... Good luck and best wishes with these discussions.."
.
Thus sprache the great Wendell.
.
There is some truth in what Leahy says here, I'm sure of it. But, more than anything, it is grasping at straws in the wind in an attempt to satisfy the dilemma under which we struggle. Everyone knows there is something very wrong with the stories we are told by our government regarding the attacks on America that fateful morning. But, what is it that is wrong? Persons with some purpose have reason to feed the minds of people who want to be first to know the "absolute truth" about anything will design and tell stories that can so easily be torn down.
.
No, Wendell, you do not know the truth of the matter no matter how hard you blow. And, if anything is obvious about you it is that you blow.
.
But, courageous people like Peter Lance and Elizabeth de la Vega who have--each of them--willingly put their life on the line by uncovering documentary proof of wrong doing and maleficenceof duty while under oath to the people of the United States of America, have provided us with some real answers.
.
The question is, "Will we and individual citizens of responsibility have the strength of mind and fortitude of patriotism to learn that truth, or, will we continue to wobble around in our ideological mindsets?"
.
Here's something by the chief author of the Constitution, James Madison: "Of all the enemies of true liberty, war is, perhaps, the most to be dreaded, because it comprises and develops the germ of every other. War is the parent of armies; from these proceed debts and taxes; and armies, and debts, and taxes are the known instruments for bringing the many under the domination of the few. In war, too, the discretionary power of the Executive is extended; its influence in dealing out offices, honors and emoluments is multiplied; and all the means of seducing the minds, are added to those of subduing the force, of the people. The same malignant aspect in republicanism may be traced in the inequality of fortunes, and the opportunities of fraud, growing out of a state of war, and in the degeneracy of manner and of morals, engendered in both. No nation can preserve its freedom in the midst of continual warfare ? War is in fact the true nurse of executive aggrandizement. In war, a physical force is to be created; and it is the executive will, which is to direct it. In war, the public treasuries are to be unlocked; and it is the executive hand which is to dispense them. In war, the honors and emoluments of office are to be multiplied; and it is the executive patronage under which they are to be enjoyed; and it is the executive brow they are to encircle. The strongest passions and most dangerous weaknesses of the human breast; ambition, avarice, vanity, the honorable or venal love of fame, are all in conspiracy against the desire and duty of peace."
.
Here's a link for some basic sensibility:
http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story...
.
If you're a Red Blooded American, you owe it to yourself to learn the facts and get off your ideological hind end.
.
:)

-- posted by pink101

» _Boanerges_ - Grasping At Straws

In response to Grasping At Straws posted by pink101:
My website.... give it a looking through, then ask the questions that do not make sense.. You might truly find your peace. Once you do, then you will be able to move forward. Otherwise, I assure you, nothing will change and the dogs breath of totalitarism will be sitting on our doorstep, and is already here.....
9-11 Controlled Demolition
http://911controlleddemolition.blogspot....
As I said. this is not my dog fight any longer.. I am glad you have finally awakened to the truth. Maybe you would be able to do that with "absolute truth". As for me, in both cases, I was not fooled..... At least you admit that you were asleep at the wheel when people like me sounded the alarm that a conspiracy was unfolding, even while we were ridiculed and mocked at..
It is now your fight, Pink.. I do wish you well in that battle....
Additionally, I doubt you can bring to yourself the truth concerning Weather Warfare. You should look into that subject as well, and then you might understand the Tsunami, Global warming hoax, and how governments are at war with weather weapons aimed at nations....
As I said.. my dog aint in this battle.. And, I see no reeason to return for nothing more than quarreling with you. As long as we quarrel (the citizens) they win (government).... Its a simple deduction that does not take much thought to understand such a concept. (divide and conquer)

Ten Years After
"I'd Love To Change The World"
Everywhere is
Freaks and hairies
Dykes and fairies
Tell me where is sanity
Tax the rich
Feed the poor
Till there are no
Rich no more
I'd love to change the world
But I don't know what to do
So I'll leave it up to you
Population
Keeps on breeding
Nation bleeding
Still more feeding, economy
Life is funny
Skies are sunny
Bees make honey
Who needs money, monopoly
I'd love to change the world
But I don't know what to do
So I'll leave it up to you
World pollution
There's no solution
Institution
Electrocution
Just black or white
Rich or poor
Them and us
Stop the war
I'd love to change the world
But I don't know what to do
So I'll leave it up to you

-- posted by _Boanerges_

» pink101 - Grasping At Straws

In response to Grasping At Straws posted by _Boanerges_:
.
Like I said, there is some truth to what you write.
.
I don't deny that. I purchased the DVDs on the theories you're believe are absolutely true. I know there is something to them; but, that wasn't my point in opening thiis thread which is to approach the issue from a new direction.
.
You're too old when you can't do that.
.

-- posted by pink101